With recent elections now behind us, a little bit of history is in order. LAUSD District 5 was created to
force the LAUSD board of education to integrate, challenging decades of de
facto apartheid.
In
1995 the LA Times reported, "Although the Los Angeles Unified race was
portrayed throughout the two-month runoff campaign as a teacher vs.
parent contest, it was also a competition between two powerful electoral
forces: the teachers union and the Latino political machine.
A
victory for Rivera, who was endorsed by most of the region's top Latino
politicians--would be seen as a stark symbol of the waning influence of
United Teachers-Los Angeles, which has funneled money and manpower to
her opponent.
If
Tokofsky wins, he would become the first white representative of the
5th District in 12 years--a blow to Latino politicians who have tried to
create and preserve the seat for a Latino. But Tokofsky expressed
optimism that supporters of both candidates will unite after the
election, regardless of who wins."
Of
course, Tokofsky is now a high priced lobbyist, and the union remains
committed to running White candidates against Mexican-origin candidates
since 1995.
Considering
Dr. Ref Rodriguez' recent electoral victory this history becomes
prescient. Ethnicity is certainly no substitute for a clear political
agenda. However Dr.Rodriguez is not only born of migrant, working class,
Mexican parents - he was also raised in the Glassel Park neighborhood
and remained committed to dedicating his education and resources to
serve children and youth like him. Among other things, Dr. Rodriguez has
committed to exploring a resurgence of Chicana/o Studies curriculum and
policies in the LAUSD. If for no other reason, this alone is reason to
support Ref.
As
with all electoral candidates, Ref will also have to be held
accountable to the community base that voted him into office. While any
opposition to the conservative forces of institutionalized unions now
costs millions of dollars, no vote was bought or paid for. That Ref's
major campaign donors were also allegedly backers of the failed tenure
of "Crooked" John Deasy, should be secondary to the organizational base
of communities this elected board must be held accountable to.
Deficit,
dilapidation, recalcitrance and disfunction. Hardly anyone would argue
with these descriptors of LAUSD. As first order of action I would call
upon the new board members to engage in listening tours with students
and parents followed by town halls and plebiscites with school community
members in each district to engage community members in deciding upon
strategic priorities. Before Ref's win, only Monica Garcia openly
defended Mexican community based interests on par with the interests of
all students. As of 2013, of the over 30,000 certificated teachers in
LAUSD, over 60% were non-"Hispanic/Latino". In contrast, over 70% of
LAUSD students are Mexican-origin. Exactly in whose interest the union
operates is clearly racialized by the demographics of district's current
credentialed workforce.
Anglican Church Archives |
Now
more than ever, the over 200,000 Spanish speaking youth and over
650,000 mostly Mexican and Central American-origin students and their
families must assert our collective majority prioritizing access to
maternal language education, culturally relevant curriculum, and full
support for college and career preparatory education. A new composition
of the board should mean a new direction in public education in Los
Angeles. De facto apartheid classrooms must end. Allies should join proactive calls for community-based self-determination. Organized Mexican, Central American and Indigenous
Peoples communities can speak for ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment